When to use linear and non-linear training strategies to meet multiple learning needs
Linear training and non-linear training represent two fundamentally different approaches to teaching and learning. Choosing the right approach is based on a few factors in the workplace.
But first, let’s look at some of the key difference:
Linear Training
Follows a structured, step-by-step process.
Emphasizes mastering foundational knowledge or skills before advancing.
Relies on a clear progression from simple to complex.
Theory-based.
Example: Teaching math by starting with addition, then moving to subtraction, multiplication, and division in that order.
Non-linear Training
Emphasizes exploration, discovery, and helps learners to see connections across disciplines.
It caters to different learning styles as learners can approach concepts in various orders or contexts.
Allows for multiple pathways to understanding.
Real-world application.
Example: Teaching math by encouraging learners to explore connections between arithmetic, geometry, and algebra through real-world problems or interdisciplinary projects.
When to use each approach:
Linear Training
To teach foundational technical skills or knowledge.
In environments with strict timelines or standardization needs eg. compliance training
For learners who benefit from structure or are new to a subject.
Non-linear Training
When fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, or innovation eg. project-based learning.
In environments where exploration or adaptability is key eg. creative fields, leadership training.
For experienced learners seeking deeper insights or real-world application.
Final thoughts:
Choose the approach based on:
Learner Needs: Are they beginners or advanced?
Learning Goals: Are you teaching foundational skills or promoting creativity?
Context: Is the subject procedural (eg. math) or open-ended (eg. design thinking)?
Choosing the wrong approach for any of these factors can lead to disengagement. For example, overly rigid methods might stifle creativity, while excessive flexibility could overwhelm learners who need structure. Based on my experience, a blended approach can often be the most effective. Example: Teach basic skills (linear), apply them in open-ended case scenarios (non-linear), and assess their understand by asking them to share what they have learned.